Quantcast
Channel: MYSTERIOUS SKIN - YUCK
Browsing all 16 articles
Browse latest View live

MYSTERIOUS SKIN - YUCK

Is it not a golden rule of film making - to leave something to the viewer's imagination? Does the director think we are so numb and dumb that we can't understand how horrific that situation would be?...

View Article



Re: MYSTERIOUS SKIN - YUCK

"A spokesman for the Australian Family Association, Richard Egan, said he was concerned after reading the film's synopsis." (Sydney Morning Herald, 19 July 2005)I think that says it all. And no people...

View Article

Re: MYSTERIOUS SKIN - YUCK

Hi, thanks for replying to my comment. I believe when the govt starts banning for example, Tarantino films etc that would be a time to start jumping up and down. I find Tarantino films scare me a bit...

View Article

Re: MYSTERIOUS SKIN - YUCK

Hey TBVSTO, not a prob, it's always a very interesting topic to talk about and one that I care a lot about.I don't believe in the government banning fictional movies where no one is harmed. Sure you...

View Article

Re: MYSTERIOUS SKIN - YUCK

This is what I'm trying to say in a more condensed, sensible fashion.Stand up for your rights, but why use films like this to do it?Make the films you want to make - but why make a film like this?See...

View Article


Re: MYSTERIOUS SKIN - YUCK

Sorry I posted my 2nd msg before I read yours. It was not a direct reply to your 2nd msg.the following is:-Yes I agree with you in some points. But can't we just do everything we can to cover every...

View Article

Re: MYSTERIOUS SKIN - YUCK

If we were to follow a system like you mention - who decides what we watch and whats not worth it?I certainly don't want the current folks at the OFLC doing it. My point remians the same - I'm the...

View Article

Re: MYSTERIOUS SKIN - YUCK

I didn't see mysterious skin, so I can't comment on that film.We have the right to decide what we want to see. Why should the government decide ? You mention that a film about pedophiles is...

View Article


Re: MYSTERIOUS SKIN - YUCK

Spot on.Delve into any sexual issues or film sex and the filmmakers run into possible major classification issues. A lot of the time filmmakers are self censoring just as magazines do because they...

View Article


Re: MYSTERIOUS SKIN - YUCK

Unless we can summon the "let's keep everybody happy & safe" fairy to act as censor, the govt looks like the best option to me. Do you suggest that it's open slather and any film at all, can be...

View Article

Re: MYSTERIOUS SKIN - YUCK

Real life of victims of what?Who is the victim of Ken Park?The only victims are those who didn't see it - they weren't given the oportunity to take anything away from it. The Catholic church is a...

View Article

Re: MYSTERIOUS SKIN - YUCK

To better sum up my point in regards to pornography. If people are LEGALLY allowed to act the "act" out in the privacy of their own homes - such as use candle wax as a sexual aid - why aren't they...

View Article

Re: MYSTERIOUS SKIN - YUCK

If all parties are willing - then that's their business what they do. What if someone isn't willing? Avid watchers will want the "real thing". The more of these films they buy, the greater the demand....

View Article


Re: MYSTERIOUS SKIN - YUCK

P.S.Thanks everyone for your comments.

View Article

Re: MYSTERIOUS SKIN - YUCK

Films that contain real crimes of rape don't get submitted to the OFLC. They are a police matter and not the OFLCs - the way it should be. The moment they contain real rape it has nothing to do with...

View Article


Re: MYSTERIOUS SKIN - YUCK

There is a line here that I have experienced so many times in open forums. The two sides will never, ever agree. I, personally, am on the side of some censorship. I don't think its appropriate to show...

View Article
Browsing all 16 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images